Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Where's Rose Mary Woods When You Need Her?
|
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Where's Rose Mary Woods When You Need Her?
Marty Lederman
Think they couldn't top the Ashcroft hospital encounter? The waterboarding and removal of Daniel Levin?
Comments:
Like crack dealers flushing the evidence down the toilet. A crime was committeed in the torture and in the coverup. I do not for one minute believe this was just an inside the CIA decision as this went to the Senate Intelligence Committee. That means this all went through Justice, Defense and the White House. That's the conspiracy to obstruct justice and it goes up to the President. It is the torture! It is the torture! It is the torture!
Best, Ben
Normally, I don't get around to reading this blog until after a certain fellow makes some ridiculous comments: this time I'm going to try to beat him to it.
1. Those CIA must have their identities protected. If they didn't the whole world could fall apart and the terrorists might win? 2. Let me ask you: do you want the terrorists to win? Yes or no. 3. The terrorists could get a hold of that tape, and pretty soon they would know how to resist all the sophisticated CIA torture techniques. This is so clearly true no argument has to be made. 4. Seriously, do you want the terrorists who are going to kill Americans to learn about the torture techniques? That would put American lives on the line. 5. Let's be practical, we need to do what it takes to win the war on terror. That feels kind of good. I hope Bart DePalma will back me up on this.
Peter: Please -- the comments section is not intended for such internecine barbs and personal attacks. Thanks
Nothing that this Administration does surprises me anymore - the culture of criminality is pervasive. That Democratic Senators were accessories to it is, however, disappointing.
Peter, the logic of the CIA's position does not stack up.
First it displays lack of confidence in the CIA's ability to keep 2 videos from falling into the wrong hands. If that is the case it is a frightening admission by the CIA as to its own poor security. Secondly, if the reason for destroying the tapes was to protect the identity of CIA operatives in the event the recording's were leaked, then on the same logic the CIA should destroy every internal document that could identify a CIA agent (unless of course the outing of a CIA agent is appproved at the highest level to undermine the credibility of a media critic of the war on terror). Third, it is rubbish to say that the tapes have no evidentiary value. The CIA continuously claims that the Al Qaeda manual tells captives to allege they were tortured, that it never tortures and such allegations are lies. If the two interrogated persons allege that any admissions or statements were the result of illegal methods, then the videos should be produced as evidence. If your local TV station can blur a face when broadcasting film footage and mask a voice to preserve someone's identity (eg. a whistleblower) it is stunning to think the CIA would find such technological advances beyond its capability. The CIA's rationale for destroying the videos is so patently manufactured as a cover up that its surprising it would convince anyone. Graham (Australia)
Since the Reagan years has there ever been a significant cost other than political for serial lawbreakers in government? All this wonderful talk of democracy, a country of laws and the Constitution (phrases which thrill in their rightness), and what do we have? More of the same. There’s a disconnect somewhere in our system, which occasionally used to rouse itself and perform the surgery needed. Year after year, the number of criminal and impeachable crimes keeps growing, and unless we’re prepared to hold lawbreaker’s accountable, it will only get worse. I was a young man when Nixon was set for impeachment and the Church Committee did its work, and distinctly remember the wonderful disinfectant smell that filled the air because of it. Today, short of a nationally televised murder by the President—what action by the government will ever be subject to the law again? The rule of law is only as good as those who are charged with upholding it, and unenforceable law is tantamount to having no law at all. In our contemporary political system even a Rose Mary Woods wouldn’t be enough.
Normally, I don't get around to reading this blog until after a certain fellow makes some ridiculous comments: this time I'm going to try to beat him to it.
Let me surprise you. It has nothing to do about what you posted. The tapes were destroyed by the CIA to keep them from being leaked to the press and published by the same heroes who leaked the existence of the program to the NYT. There was no fear of an investigation by Congress or the IG because both were well aware of and supported the interrogation program and know what the program produced. This is all fairly self evident, but please do go on with your conspiracy theories.
I could see the CIA doing this under any administration. They're not nice people, you know; Their jobs don't permit it. And the "not nice" isn't always going to be directed in the direction.
Bart, their motives for destroying the records might be understandable, but that's no defense. Civilian accountability requires that agencies like the CIA not be permitted to frustrate oversight in ways like this. There MUST be consequences.
Those tapes would appear to be records under the Federal Records Act of 1950:
"TITLE 44 > CHAPTER 33 > § 3301 Definition of records As used in this chapter, “records” includes all books, papers, maps, photographs, machine readable materials, or other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the Government or because of the informational value of data in them. Library and museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, extra copies of documents preserved only for convenience of reference, and stocks of publications and of processed documents are not included. " And should be preserved--I don't believe there is a section of the act empowering destruction if you tell a Congressional committee chairman you are going to do so. Furthermore, these records should have produced for the court previously. Hayden or Goss or somebody should be held accountable--this is the accountability administration, isn't it?
If government officials destroyed evidence sought in a criminal case and then lied to a court about the existence of such evidence, can the court exercise its inherent power to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate possible contempt charges against the government officials? I just wonder if Judge Brinkema could get the ball rolling without waiting for the Justice Department.
I think Judge Brinkema could issue an Order to Show Cause to the US Attorney why he should not be held in contempt of court. Beyond that, she could refer this to the DOJ for a criminal investigation. But, judges in the US don't have the authority to prosecute, much as some of them might think otherwise.
Regarding the earlier comment I left, I think Professor Lederman has rather unfairly characterized my intention and effect. I made a joke at the expense of one of the regular blog comment-makers. I will not do so again; certainly, I respect the etiquette that the blog operators, Lederman et al., choose for their blog. However, I think it is worth expressing my *obviously fallible opinion* that Prof. Lederman's reaction to my joke is overly sensitive, and doesn't allow for the use of humor to reveal the absurdity of someone else's position.
I also don't agree that I made a personal attack. I highlighted the rhetoric that is used by many people who are devoted supporters of some particular state, in this case the one run by American Presidential Administration. It is my understanding from reading the comments sections, that Mr. DePalma holds these views, and I used his name as a way of making the point. I doubt very much that my comment could end up as a source of serious conflict, but to the extent that anyone was offended, please understand it wasn't my intention of cause strife, and accept my apology.
"Bart" DePalma:
The tapes were destroyed by the CIA to keep them from being leaked to the press and published by the same heroes who leaked the existence of the program to the NYT.... ... so the Terra-ists will find out about our methods and be able to circumvent them, just as they did when that treasonous N.Y. Times gave "aid and comfort" to our Enemies by leaking our wiretapping methods. Sounds like Peter had it spot-on. Thanks, Peter, I think you may actually have savedsome bandwidth. Nonetheless, the claim they did it because the "CIA must have their identities protected" stretches credibility a bit too much given the the maladministration's actions in Plame affair. I doubt that even "Bart" would try and pass that laugher off. Prof. Lederman: Sometimes laughter is the best medicine. Not even the U.S. Supreme Court attaches judicial scowls as a matter of course 24X7.... Cheers,
Doc Rock,
According to Bush, they already had an "accountability moment"... "We had an accountability moment, and that's called the 2004 election." (Source: Washington Post, 01-16-05)
"Bart" DePalma:
There was no fear of an investigation by Congress or the IG because both were well aware of and supported the interrogation program and know what the program produced. The IG is a different subject (being in the hands of the maladministration), but as to Congress: Congress was not "well aware" of these various things. Four selected Congresscritters doesn't a Congress make. Not to mention, it doesn't suddenly become 'legal' just because you tell a few 'in-crowd buddies'about it (even if they don't complain, however meekly and privately). It's the laws that are being violated, not the sensibilities of a couple of Congressmen. Cheers,
FWIW, I heard on the radio (but have no source) that the revelation of the Iran NIE was due to high career intelligence officials threatening, even to the point of going to prison if necessary, to blow the whistle on the NIE stuff if the maladministration kept sitting on it....
Cheers,
I already blogged Thursday that Harman and Rockefeller were incompetent at least, immoral at most, for not leaking from the start about this.
Why would anybody who really cares about civil liberties vote Democratic any more than Republican any more?
"Why would anybody who really cares about civil liberties vote Democratic any more than Republican any more?"
Seriously? It depends on which civil liberties you care more about: Neither major party is at all good on civil liberties overall, but they each have particular civil liberties they're especially bad about. Depending on how you weight those liberties, you'll find one party or the other to be the lesser evil. You're not going to think either party is actually good on civil liberties unless you're willing to dismiss some liberties as inconsequential.
brett said...
Bart, their motives for destroying the records might be understandable, but that's no defense. Civilian accountability requires that agencies like the CIA not be permitted to frustrate oversight in ways like this. There MUST be consequences. Frustrating what oversight? The congressional intel committees knew about these tapes and, so far as we know, never asked to see them. Indeed, Congress was fully briefed on the coercive interrogation methods allegedly shown on the tapes from the outset. The WP is reporting that, in 2002, the CIA briefed Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan) on the CIA detention centers and the coercive interrogation techniques being used there, including waterboarding. None protested the coercive techniques. Instead, two wondered of they were tough enough to get the intelligence we needed. Consequently, I can do without Dem hypocrisy on this issue. The leadership damn well knew and approved of the methods CIA was using to gain the information which helped roll up much of al Qaeda.
Bart DePalma, the WaPo is right on task, doing their hatchet job on this issue. It's obvious the whole event has been turned on its head in order to "blame the Dems". Who approved the torture? Who destroyed the tapes? And what were they hiding? Those are the pertinent questions. Those and why this is coming up now, just when the national conversation had been revolving instead around the NIE on Iran.
carolab said...
Bart DePalma, the WaPo is right on task, doing their hatchet job on this issue. It's obvious the whole event has been turned on its head in order to "blame the Dems". No one is blaming the Dems. Nearly every oversight agency in both elected branches approved the CIA coercive interrogation. The WP story simply keeps the Dems from lying about what they approved. You may notice the deafening silence from the congressional majority.
s39.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.oxcis rumah alam sutera serpong di jual rumah alam sutera tangerang jual rumah alam sutera jual rumah alam sutera jual rumah di alam sutera 2012 jual rumah alam sutera 2010 perumahan alam sutera serpong jual rumah murah di alam sutera harga perumahan alam sutera tangerang rumah dijual alam sutera serpong rumah sutra alam ciapus bogor jual rumah di alam sutera onyx rumah dijual di sutera palma alam sutera peta perumahan alam sutera serpong rumah dikontrakan di alam sutera rumah kecil alam sutera rumah murah di alam sutera rumah di alam sutera serpong rumah dikontrakan alam sutera sewa rumah murah alam sutera
e glance of your site is magnificent, as dijual apartemen di jakarta jual apartemen apartemen murah apartemen dijual di jakarta apartemen jakarta barat apartemen dijual jakarta apartemen sewa apartemen jakarta apartement murah apartemen dijual murah sewa apartemen jakarta daftar apartemen murah apartemen pavilion jakarta sewa apartemen harian dijual apartemen murah di jakarta rumah di jakarta harga rumah murah di jakarta jual rumah jakarta utara rumah disewakan di jakarta rumah jakarta utara
a wanting me to put in ad in their golf jual rumah murah di gading dijual rumah murah di gading jual rumah gading serpong sektor harga makanan rumah kayu gading rumah disewakan di beryl apartemen jakarta ekonomi apartemen sewa jakarta sewa apartemen harian harga sewa apartemen di jakarta apartemen bersubsidi di jakarta apartemen jakarta 2014 apartemen termahal di apartemen baru jakarta apartemen disewakan di jakarta kerjasama apartemen disewakan harian apartemen dijual murah di jakarta jakarta apartemen apartemen murah di jakarta apartemen mewah di jakarta apartemen jakarta jual
pplications so I have been looking aroun dijual apartemen di jakarta apartemen di kelapa gading apartemen termahal di jakarta jakarta apartemen apartemen jakarta residence jual apartemen murah harga sewa apartemen murah di harga sewa apartemen di jakarta apartemen baru jakarta apartemen baru di jakarta apartemen batavia jakarta yang daftar apartemen murah di apartemen bersubsidi di harga apartemen jakarta cari apartemen murah apartemen bersubsidi jakarta sewa apartemen jakarta barat apartemen bersubsidi di jakarta jual apartemen jakarta dijual apartemen di jakarta
nderful blog. An exc portofolio jasarumahbangunan.com testimoni jasarumahbangunan.com Blog JRB Jasa Rumah Bangunan jasa bangun rumah jasa desain jasa desain arsitektur jasa desain furniture jasa kontraktor jasa kontraktor contblock jasa kontraktor cor hotmix jasa kontraktor drainase jasa kontraktor instalasi listrik jasa kontraktor landscape jasa kontraktor waterproofing jual material bangunan jual baja ringan jual bata Jasa Bangun Rumah Tentang JRB Multipro Indonesia Arsip JRB Multipro Indonesia
you write again soon cari rumah bintaro cari rumah di jakarta timur cari rumah di jual cari rumah disewakan cari rumah murah di bintaro cari sewa rumah cluster darwin cluster flamboyan alam sutera cluster murah di bintaro daerah bintaro Jual Rumah Rumah Di Alam Sutera Rumah Alam Sutera Rumah Dijual Bsd Jual Rumah Bsd Serpong Rumah Gading Serpong Rumah Dijual Di Gading Serpong Rumah Alam Sutera Rumah Dijual Alam Sutera Rumah Bintaro
Post a Comment
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |